Pro10 min

Multi-Agent and Orchestrated Workflows

Some jobs are too big for one agent holding everything in one context. The fix is to split the work: a coordinator agent breaks the task into pieces and hands each to a specialist agent with its own narrow tools and instructions, then assembles the results. This keeps each context small, focused, and easier to debug.

Common orchestration patterns

PatternShapeUse when
PipelineA then B then CFixed, ordered stages
RouterCoordinator picks one specialistMixed request types
ParallelFan out, then mergeIndependent subtasks
ReviewerWorker, then critic loopQuality matters

A reviewer pattern is worth special mention: one agent does the work, a second agent checks it against the requirements and sends it back with notes if it falls short. This catches mistakes a single pass misses, at the cost of extra calls.

Multi-agent research flow
You
Research our top 3 competitors and draft a one-page brief.
Agent
Coordinator: splitting into 3 research tasks, one per competitor, running in parallel.
Agent
Specialist agents: returned facts, pricing, and positioning for each.
Agent
Coordinator: merged findings, removed duplicates, drafted the brief. Reviewer agent approved.
Coordinator fans out, specialists work, coordinator merges.
Do not reach for this too early
Multi-agent setups multiply cost, latency, and failure points. Most problems are solved by one well-equipped agent. Add a second agent only when a single one provably cannot hold the task, not because it sounds impressive.

Result: a workflow that handles a task too large for one context window, with each agent's work small enough to inspect and fix on its own.

Hands-on tasks